Movie Review

This will be the first movie review on this blog and it will likely be the only movie review that will ever be seen on these pages.  The movie is a TV mini-series called The Kennedys.   I found it on “On Demand”.   It can also be found on a cable network, REELZ. 

The portrayal of the Kennedys was surprisingly honest.  I wasn’t certain what to expect initially but I found the series to be excellent.   Greg Kinnear was made to look very much like Jack Kennedy.   Katie Holmes was equally well cast as Jackie Kennedy and Barry Pepper as Robert Kennedy. 

Joe Kennedy was defined as the narcissistic and controlling son of a bitch that he really was.  He was portrayed as having had presidential ambitions in the mid 30’s that were destroyed when Roosevelt brought him back from Europe as Ambassador to England.  He had shown sympathy to Hitler’s quest to unite the Germans of the Sudetenland with Germany and he supported Chamberlain’s program of appeasement.  When he lost his chance at the presidency he groomed his oldest son Joe to enter politics.   This was Joe’s ambition as well.  In fact, Joe Jr. was so ardent in his quest to someday be president that he died in an attempt to become a hero and win an award equal to that his brother earned after he led the surviving crew of PT 109 to safety.  The story emphasized Joe’s insensitivity toward his wife by the affair he conducted with his secretary right under her nose,   He passed this penchant for infidelity onto his sons.  The movie further explored his deal making that included his use of Frank Sinatra as an avenue to reach Sam Giancana to deliver Chicago to John in 1960.  It then portrayed a bitter Giancana after Robert Kennedy used his position as Attorney General to make a strike at organized crime.  Giancana believed he had a deal with the Kennedys and Papa Joe made it clear to Sinatra that he had no right to make any deals with Giancana on behalf of the Kennedys.  Despite his wife’s strong religious faith it was made clear that Joe had no similar relationship with God and in fact, upon the death of his oldest son he made it clear that he had no more respect for his wife’s faith than he did for his wife.    

Jack Kennedy was portrayed as the womanizing man that he was.  The movie fully recognized the pain he endured that led him to a life marred by the use of drugs.  It identified the prescription medications that he indulged in and how that pain led him to Dr. Feelgood as he was referenced who obviously shot him up with some kind of illegal narcotic.  Jack was initially portrayed as a man unwilling to enter politics believing that politics was not a career he had initially sought but one instead that his father bullied him into entering.  Jack’s weakness as Commander-in-Chief during the Bay of Pigs was emphasized as was his weakness when later challenged by Nikita Krushchev as the Berlin Wall was being built.  His sexual liaison with the girlfriend of Sam Giancana was referenced and the use that J Edgar Hoover made of that liaison to effectively blackmail both Jack and Bobby was noted.  The movie deals with the racial crisis that was a large part of 1962 including the admission of James Meredith to the University of Mississippi.  The sixth episode dealt with the Cuban Missile Crisis and it gave a far more believable presentation of what likely happened in those critical days between the US and the Soviets than any other account I ever saw before.  I never believed the account that was given in the movie 13 Days because I believe it overdramatized a confrontation between Bobby Kennedy and the Soviet Ambassador suggesting that the younger Kennedy drove the ambassador to sweat bullets for fear that we were prepared to go to war.  The account I saw in The Kennedys spoke of the agreement between the Soviets and Kennedy by which Kennedy would pull missiles from Turkey six months after the crisis.  This was always rumored but also denied that there was any relationship between that act and the Cuban Missile Crisis.  Nevertheless, most learned persons believed there to be a relationship and apparently so did the producers of this show.       

Jackie was portrayed initially as a strong woman who was prepared to divorce her husband in 1953 but who stayed with him for reasons that were not made clear to us except that it was as a result of her conversation with Papa Joe and the knowledge that a divorce would end Jack’s opportunity to later be president.  Perhaps she wanted to be First Lady.   Joe offered Jackie money.  She asked if he thought everyone could be bought.  He responded that he knew of no exceptions.  She then told him she could not be bought.  Yet, she stayed.  She apparently learned to live with Jack’s infidelity but once he won the 1960 election she made it clear that she would not accept the humiliation related to his infidelity in front of the American people.  When it continued she took the children and left temporarily but the danger associated with the Cuban Missile Crisis brought her back.  Her protective attitude toward her children was well noted.  Her attempts to raise her children while meeting her obligations as First Lady were identified to the point that she suffered from exhaustion.  Something I personally did not know is that Dr. Feelgood also treated Jackie for this exhaustion.  Apparently Dr. Feelgood was not a doctor at all and when Jack discovered that he was also treating Jackie he convinced her to stop seeing him.  This portrayal of Jackie was completely believable as it has often been said that Jackie later married Aristotle Onassis to enable her to escape the reach of the Kennedys and thus protect her children from the Kennedy influence.      

Rose Kennedy was portrayed as the matriarch of the family and tremendously religious.  Her job was to hold her family together regardless of her husband’s obvious infidelity.  I found her weak and worse than sympathetic.  She was pitiful in her willingness to allow her husband to carry on an affair with his secretary with his demonstrations of affection right in front of Rose.   

Bobby was portrayed by Barry Pepper as someone who lacked tact and was downright abusive in the way he spoke to everyone except his father.  His relationship with his father was pathetic.  He apparently did not want to be Attorney General.  He wanted to open a practice in Boston, not become AG.  But he became AG because Papa Joe told John to make him AG.  Because of the accuracy of other portrayals, I must believe this was also correct.  It is unfortunate that so many people voted for Jack Kennedy under the assumption he was his own man.  He certainly was not in 1960 or 1961.      

The story deals with the tragedy surrounding Rosemary and her diminished mental capacity, her institutionalization and Papa Joe’s order for a lobotomy without the knowledge of Rose to control his daughter’s behavior.  The procedure turned her into a purely vegetative state.  Ironically, the story does not even mention Teddy Kennedy or his diminished mental capacity.   But the series would have to have gone on for forty or more additional episodes to have included the damage he did to this nation.

The final two episodes deal with the assassinations of John F. Kennedy and Robert F. Kennedy. 

The Assassination of John F. Kennedy  Was it one man acting alone?

Who had motives?  

Certainly Sam Giancana had a motive.  The Kennedys came after him despite the assistance he gave Kennedy in the 1960 election.   Plus, Jack was messing around with Giancana’s girl friend.  Who better than Giancana to arrange for one Jack Ruby to kill Lee Harvey Oswald as he emerged from the Dallas Jail inside the parking garage?

Castro had a motive.  Both the Bay of Pigs and the Cuban Missile Crisis provided him motive.  It was also mentioned that Kennedy had tried to assassinate Castro with the understanding that if he failed, he could end up in Castro's gun sight. 

The Cuban exiles had motive.  Kennedy had refused air support that cost many of their friends their lives.    

Lyndon Johnson had a motive.  He hated the Kennedys and the Kennedys did not like or respect him.  Kennedy had denied Johnson the presidency in 1960 and it was all too evident that Johnson would not be on a Kennedy ticket in 1964.  Kennedy no longer needed Johnson the way he needed Johnson to carry Texas and other southern states in 1960. 

 

 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

  • 5/21/2011 5:51 PM liz wrote:
    I came across your blog and read because I am sincerely interested in reviewing the Tea Party platform to see what you sets you apart from the Republican and Independent Parties. Sadly, the only real impression your blog gives of the Tea Party is the stereotype conveyed by your detractors. There is an overwhelming obsession with Pres. Obama to the point that your blog appears to be nothing more than a "hate manifesto". I understand that there are serious differences but such a harsh and hatred tone is counter-productive. The tone is offensive and off-putting to those who are looking for an intelligent alternative. Such viciousness only blur the real issues. Thank you
    Reply to this
    1. 5/24/2011 9:17 AM The Patriot wrote:

      I would not consider this site as containing an "overwhelming obsession" with Barack Obama and it is certainly not a "hate manifesto".  Sadly, some people see any criticism of this president as hate when it is only intended to recognize that like all other presidents Obama must be held accountable.  Sadly we have a press that has redefined itself into propaganda ministers ignoring news that fails to meld with their agenda and therefore it is blogs like this and through the journalistic integrity of the Fox News Channel where he can be held accountable.  Due to the overwhelming evidence that he is systematically destroying a country that I hold dear, it would be overwhelmingly understandable for people to believe his motives to be malevolent.  This does not mean that anyone hates this president.  It means we hate his policies and we hate what he is doing to this country.  We hate the thought of the destruction he has done to our economy, the damage he has done to families and to our liberties.  We hate the cavalier manner in which he ignores the limits of our Constitution and we hate the overwhelming evidence that he is nothing like what he promised he would be in his campaign with the exception that he does apparently wish to "spread the wealth" and he apparently does wish to bankrupt coal companies and send the price for a gallon of gasoline above $5.  His first act as president was to sign a $700 billion "stimulus" into law that has stimulated nothing and it was all borrowed money.  His policies have included large doses of uncertainty that have resulted in continuing high levels of unemployment for more than two years.  Beyond all of this he promised transparency.  He promised to blur the divisions between red states and blue states and to be the president of all the people.  Then, when he saw his super majority in the Congress he governed with the attitude of a tyrant.  "I won" he proclaimed to John McCain when his ideas were challenged by members of the Republican minority and the folly of his ideas had been stripped bare by Congressman Ryan.  Was this an adequate substitute for substance in an argument?  He had his Congressional lackeys build this healthcare plan, a plan that more than 60% of the nation did not want, behind closed doors with no real debate and not even an opportunity for representatives to read, study or debate the legislation before they were called upon to vote.  Obama, Reid and Pelosi presided over a new form of tyranny in Washington.  Obama has demonstrated himself to be a narcissistic man who resembles Nero more than Lincoln whom he has compared himself to constantly.  He has spent the nation into oblivion and he has appointed men like Eric Holder and Ken Salazar into key positions where Obama's ideology can do exponentially more damage to our nation than Obama could ever do all by himself in one term.  On a per capita basis there are more of this nation's radical filth in this administration than you could ever find on the streets of any metropolitan area or Ivy League University.  He has repeatedly lied to the American people about his healthcare plan and about his stimulus and he has extorted bondholders as he worked to nationalize two of the nation's largest auto companies.  He has used the US Treasury as his personal piggy bank to reward his cronies for their support and to help finance his re-election campaign.  Organizations who "overwhelmingly" supported his ideology of universal healthcare now are surprisingly being granted waivers from the very legislation they promoted.  AARP, unions, even expensive restaurants in Nancy Pelosi's Congressional District in San Francisco have been granted waivers from Obamacare.  These are organizations that either directly attempted to influence the legislation in favor of passage or who indirectly influenced the legislation by electing Pelosi to do this bidding on their behalf. 

      Do I need to go on?  Despite all of this I do not wish the president any personal harm as I would if I truly hated him.  I simply want him to return to Illinois, Hawaii. Ireland, Kenya or wherever he calls home.   

      Now what did I just express that in any way blurred the real issues in your mind?  I don't believe there was anything blurred at all.  This man has done more damage in two and one half years than any other president in the history of this nation.  He has to be stopped in 2012 and this won't be done by playing softball with a political machine like is managed in Chicago. 


      Reply to this
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Name (required)

 Email (will not be published) (required)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.